Understanding Alpha vs. Numeric Sizing for Clothing Patterns: Which One is Right for You?

When it comes to creating clothing patterns, one of the most common questions I get asked is about Alpha vs. Numeric Sizing. People want to know when to choose each system, how they differ, and why they matter in the world of fashion. This post will walk you through everything you need to know, with clear explanations and handy charts to make sizing a breeze!
Understanding Alpha vs. Numeric Sizing for Clothing Patterns: Which One is Right for You?

Understanding Alpha vs. Numeric Sizing: Your Essential Guide

When it comes to creating clothing patterns, one of the most common questions I get asked is about Alpha vs. Numeric Sizing. People want to know when to choose each system, how they differ, and why they matter in the world of clothing. This blog will walk you through everything you need to know, with clear explanations and handy charts to make sizing a breeze!

What Is Alpha Sizing vs. Numeric Sizing?

Numeric sizing is when sizes are represented by numbers, like 8, 10, 12, or 14. This system allows for more specific measurements and typically caters to a narrower size range.

Alpha sizing, on the other hand, uses letters such as S (Small), M (Medium), and L (Large). This type of sizing is popular because it requires fewer options and can cover a broad range of body types without needing precise adjustments.

Alpha vs. Numeric Sizing: Why It Matters

Choosing the right sizing system impacts your clothing line's production and customer satisfaction. For example, alpha sizing can be easier to manage since it reduces the number of size variations needed. However, numeric sizing may better suit fitted garments as it provides more exact measurements.

If you're producing oversized garments, alpha sizing is often a good option because it accommodates more people without needing to create as many pattern grades.

Alpha vs. Numeric Sizing for Different Markets

Here’s where things can get tricky: Alpha and numeric sizing systems vary between Australia and the USA. In women's clothing for example, in Australia, each alpha size (like "Small" or "Medium") has a 7.5cm (3") grade difference compared to the USA which has a 10cm (4") grade difference. This difference can lead to confusion, especially if you're targeting customers from both regions.

Alpha Sizing in Australia
In Australia, alpha sizing typically covers one and a half sizes for each lettered size (for example, a "Medium" may include sizes 12 and 14).

Alpha Sizing in the USA
In the USA, the grading scale doubles, so each alpha size (like "Medium") might cover two full sizes.

Why Some Garments Work Better with Alpha Sizing

Alpha sizing tends to work well for loose or oversized styles because the broader size range accommodates slight variations in body size without compromising the garment’s fit. For instance, if you’re producing sportswear or casual wear, alpha sizing might be the best option.

However, alpha sizing isn’t as suitable for fitted garments or garments that have a waist like track pants and shorts. Since alpha sizes have a bigger gap between sizes (about 7.5 cm in Australia and 10 cm in the USA), they may feel too loose or tight for someone looking for a more tailored fit.

Numeric Sizing: When Precision Counts

When it comes to more fitted garments, numeric sizing is often the preferred option. Each numeric size is more precise, which is ideal for styles that require a snug fit or have little room for error in the measurements.

Alpha vs. Numeric Sizing: How to Choose

Deciding between alpha and numeric sizing depends on the style of clothing and your target market. Here are some general rules to help you make the right choice:

  1. For Loose-Fitting Garments: Alpha sizing can simplify production and inventory management while covering a broad size range.
  2. For Tailored Garments: Numeric sizing gives the precision needed for a close fit, especially for women’s fashion.
  3. For Mixed Markets: If your garments are sold internationally, consider adapting your alpha sizing for each region.

Comparing Alpha and Numeric Sizing in Australia and the USA

Take a look at this chart comparing alpha vs. numeric sizing for both Australia and the USA:

Australia Alpha vs. Numeric Sizing Chart

Alpha Size Numeric Size (AU)
S (Small) 10
M (Medium) 12 - 14
L (Large) 16 
XL (Extra Large) 18-20

USA Alpha vs. Numeric Sizing Chart

Alpha Size Numeric Size (US)
S (Small) 4 - 6
M (Medium) 8 - 10
L (Large) 12 - 14
XL (Extra Large) 16 - 18

Alpha vs. Numeric Sizing for Pattern Makers

For pattern makers, deciding between alpha vs. numeric sizing can affect how your designs fit across different sizes. Alpha sizing may require adjustments for garments meant to be worn tightly, as the broader size range can lead to inconsistent fits.

How to use Pattern Room for Alpha Sizing

When using Pattern Room for alpha sizing in women’s wear, the process is especially easy if you’re in the US. For each size bracket, simply choose every second numeric size to align with alpha sizing, selecting the upper size within each range. This ensures a relaxed, comfortable fit, especially for oversized garments. But what about the size you didn’t choose? It’s actually beneficial to keep it on hand. If your customers ever request a more precise fit, you’ll have the option to offer that additional size without starting from scratch.

In Australia, alpha sizing with Pattern Room can be a little trickier. For instance, Small generally matches with a size 10, but for a Medium, you may need to choose between a size 12 or 14, depending on how fitted or loose you’d like the garment to be. Likewise, a Large usually aligns with a size 16, while for an Extra Large, you’d choose between an 18 or 20. As in the US, selecting the upper size often works best, especially for looser styles, but it’s handy to keep the alternate size available. This backup size gives you the flexibility to accommodate customers seeking a more tailored fit in the future.

For kidswear, the good news is that alpha sizing is the same between the US and Australia. This consistency makes it easy to apply across regions and gives you one less thing to worry about when selecting sizes in Pattern Room.

 

Choosing the Right Sizing for Your Business

So, what’s best for your business? Here’s my recommendation:

  • For Flexibility: If you want flexibility in stock management, alpha sizing is often easier to work with. With fewer sizes, you can reduce production costs and still reach a broad audience.
  • For Customer Satisfaction: If customers are particular about fit, especially with fitted or formal clothing, then numeric sizing can ensure a better experience.

Common Myths About Alpha vs. Numeric Sizing

Some people assume that each numeric size corresponds to an alpha size, but it’s rarely a direct match. If you’re looking to match a numeric size to an alpha one, remember that sizing charts vary widely by region and brand.

While some brands might offer "Small" as equivalent to a size 10, others might classify "Small" differently. Therefore, it’s crucial to consult specific sizing charts for accurate conversions.

Alpha vs. Numeric Sizing for Sportswear

If you’re a manufacturer focused on sportswear, alpha sizing can save you time and resources. Sportswear is often designed to be loose or stretchy, making it easier to use alpha sizes without sacrificing comfort or style.

Whether you’re leaning towards alpha sizing or numeric sizing, understanding their differences can help you make the best choice for your product line. Remember that alpha sizing is great for loose styles, while numeric sizing works best for tailored fits. By knowing your market and the needs of your customers, you’ll find the perfect fit—literally and figuratively!

If you’re ready to take the next step in creating high-quality patterns, check out our library of patterns available in both DXF and Ai formats, ready within 48 hours. Whether you're opting for alpha or numeric sizing, we’re here to help you get it right from the start.

Updated on

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.